|
Welcome to Issue 3 of the IT Leaders' Open Source Newsletter. This month we focus on integration. It's a challenge all enterprises large and small tackle with varying degrees of success. Our timing with this feature is impeccable as we focus our efforts at Hubstone on our own integration capability.
For those wanting to get ahead in the integration stakes, we are announcing the first European training event for Jitterbit. Read on if you want to accelerate your integration project with integration productivity tools. |
||||||
|
In this months newsletter
|
||||||
|
Good enough integration?
It's hard to ignore the focus that Service Oriented Architecture is getting, and while SOA may be the main focus for enterprise application architecture, here at Hubstone we see a medium to long term strategy for most organisations who engage this approach. Web services is still a moving target and likely wont justify the investment in skills and infrastructure for a lot of smaller organisations. The standards are firming up all the time and the gaps are closing, but most architects recognise that there are still challenges to be addressed. Whatever your application strategy, keeping a flexible approach to solving and supporting tactical application integration projects can complement and enhance both a SOA focused enterprise and the smaller player.
Even in a SOA environment, while your business leaders may have signed on the dotted line for the concept of IT applications as a set of service components there must be a continued focus on the current application portfolio ensuring adequate integration tools are available to support on-going tactical business requirements. There is no mistaking that a move to a service oriented architecture will deliver far reaching business benefits for some organisations. However, we believe the old sledgehammer to crack a nut may creep in here if you don't ensure each of your integration projects are reviewed carefully. Does the business benefit and overall return justify the investment integration projects entail.
At the architectural nirvana end, there is an underlying belief that if you get the architecture right then you needn't worry about mapping IT to business strategy. The architecture will give you the platform from which to respond to the business whichever direction it takes. There's a lot of sense in this approach, but it raises questions too:
There's a similar leap of faith with this as there is for some organisation with open source. There's a certain amount of believing in your investment. Strategy is great, but at some point even the most ardent strategists want to see delivery and execution.
We'll ignore the history lesson on the Gordian knot, but the term should clearly resonate with some organisations in their approach to integration. On the dark side of integration sit the organisations that spend the majority of their time delivering quick wins, tactical projects and dirty fixes. The problem with this type of integration is that the project numbers generally stack up. At some point though, it just becomes unsupportable and your strategy is lost. The complexity of the tactical solutions becomes an increasing barrier to doing anything right. Something we all like to do from time to time.
So is there a happy middle ground to be found in what is certainly one of the most challenging aspects of IT? At Hubstone, we believe a product called Jitterbit can sit somewhere in between. It's probably best described as a consolidated tactical tool that wont hurt your longer term strategy. It is standards based and its roadmap should give your strategists warm fuzzy feelings. It is also a fast, visual tool, focused on reusable integrations and a non-developer skillset. Some level of scripting is a given in an integration, but this needn't be the level of complexity that your current solutions have. See our partneship announcement later on in the newsletter for more information and opportunities to train in the Jitterbit product. |
||||||
|
FLOSS - practical business opportunity or religion?
For those of you out there that don't live and breathe free software, this may not be a debate you've seen. First of all it's worth noting that there are varying schools of thought around this overall software movement. We always seem to wind up at both ends of the spectrum with IT; FLOSS is no exception (Free Libre Open Source Software). It's inevitable that in any movement founded in values and beliefs that there will be passionate people.
It's all too easy to confuse this passion with moaning, both for those that observe and for those that participate. Just as there are practical business realities to FLOSS there are also ideological disputes and debate to be had. There is a balance to be achieved out there as well as a gap to be bridged. It's worth noting that a lot of FLOSS developers out there do this because they believe it is right, but there are also a fair share that do it because they are paid to by businesses whose strategies are built around it. So the reality of FLOSS is that is has both business opportunity and a belief system within the overall software movement. How do you tackle that as a business though? In our experience, FLOSS is a learning curve and we need to learn the lessons in order to move it forward. No-one yet has the answers to what will commercially be most effective in this space. It's part of the learning process that the commercial open source companies out there experiment with business models. In the same way, proprietary vendors are responding with new business models. Time will tell as to which works best but the important point for FLOSS is that it is not a model in isolation of other approaches. In order to get to what many of us believe is a 'better place' for software we need to experiment and collaborate in how we approach the business of it. From a customer perspective, that's why we believe we're here. We can help you to navigate FLOSS both strategically and tactically with real business solutions. Open source is a reality that all business will face over the coming years. You almost certainly have it within your environment already. We can help you maximise you investment in it. |
||||||
|
Novell Open Office for SMBs
After reading this announcement on the register, you could be forgiven for wondering whether Novell are firmly in bed with Microsoft or competing with them. It's a mixed message and you have to question whether clients get confused by the overall strategy. Maybe it is just the Microsoft deal that has caused confusion and a fair share of resentment within the community. The principle issue is that there is some kind of notion that there is only one official version of Linux that you wont get sued for. Don't worry Mr Enterprise it will be the little guy that writes the code that gets sued now. It smacks of biting the hand that feeds you.
Novell's Open Workgroup Suite packages their Open Enterprise Server, Zenworks suite, Groupwise, Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop and OpenOffice.org. It's a clear swipe at Microsoft's dominance in this space in the SMB market. Is this new ground though? It looks remarkably like Novell just packaging up existing tools and calling them an SMB solution. Open source has plenty to offer SMBs in the desktop, server and business application space. Maybe a wrapped offering from Novell will work really well for SMBs backed by Novell's undoubted capability in this space. There are options though and plenty of open source companies able to deliver solutions in this space. Indeed at Hubstone, we are able to offer a variety of core business solutions for the SMB market. Our partnership with SpikeSource enables us to offer fully supported implementations of Email, CRM, Document Management and with more to come from SpikeSource the portfolio will just become more compelling. There are a mass of very interesting SMB opportunities in open source. |
||||||
|
Beware IT consumerisation - CIO Magazine
The online version of CIO magazine is listing an interesting story focusing on the threat of IT consumerisation in enterprise IT environments. Read the full article here, but don't miss out on our commentary......read on. It's an interesting follow on from last month's focus on policy. The CIO magazine article comes off the back of a Gartner report which focuses on the pote ntial security issues. With staff wanting to use more of their personal IT equipment and services into your environment, how will you respond. Just consider the recent technologies to grace this space; Hotmail, MSN, Skype, Palm, Pocket PC, Yahoo.
We remember well the challenges of senior members of the business wanting to be enabled on the PDAs they'd bought and what a support nightmare they were. Likewise, how many personal email services can you block and the new generation of Web 2.0 applications bring communication on levels which are difficult to track. Skype for example is both difficult to block and worrying in terms of the degree of business that your organisation may be doing through this technology. We use it extensively at Hubstone to communicate with US based open source companies, but then we're not a bank. A draconian block on these consumer technologies is also likely not a solution. Our working environment has changed and the Internet has brought us new ways of engaging suppliers and customers. It also brings us new ways to add value to the working lives of our employees. Why not bite the technology bullet on it being there and cover yourself with clear common sense policy. It's there, it isn't supported, don't abuse it and don't conduct business across it. So what's the open source link here? Apart from the fact that most of this is built on or at the very least standing on the shoulders of open source thinking not a great deal. It never ceases to amaze us how robust these social networking platforms are. Is there something for business to learn from these systems? There are some smart IT organisations out there that look to these consumer technologies for inspiration on better business collaboration. The commuter trains are full of blackberry devices keeping staff on top of those emails that simply cannot wait the 30 minutes the journey to work takes. Is there any such thing as a 9 to 5 job anymore where we have managed to extend the working day so comprehensively? The blackberry is a great innovation predominately based on the ongoing difficulties we all had getting PDAs to really work in a corporate environment. Maybe consumerisation has just been the forerunner to initiatives like SaaS. Clearly SaaS is about how we engage and pay for corporate applications, but aren't these type of software services everywhere anyway. We may have paid for them like corporates but some of these web 2.0 environments are fairly sophisticated application. While you spend your time trying to keep everything out there are companies trying to shift there major applications out of their environment. There are interesting times ahead. |
||||||
|
Jitterbit
|
||||||
|
We're finally there, so we'd be pleased to talk with you about SpikeSource solutions. Our key focus at the moment is on Alfresco document management and we still have some work to do in pulling together our overall solution. We believe this gives us more breadth in our service offering and enables us to offer a more complete solution portfolio to our clients. For more information about SpikeSource click here . |
||||||
|
Your Feedback
..is valuable to us. If there are any topics you'd like us to focus on within these newsletters or you have suggestions to improve the content then please let us know. Drop us an email at newsletters@hubstone.co.uk. You can also provide anonymous feedback online using our new form here. Please forward on the following link to any colleagues you think may want to subscribe to our newsletter.
Until our next instalment The Hubstone Team |
